Will AI Replace Jobs? 17 Job Types That Might be Affected
20 Tech Companies Hiring In The IT Channel: July 2025
20 Tech Companies Hiring In The IT Channel: July 2025Ahead, Bulletproof, World Wide Technology, Armada, Vercel and Kaseya were among the tech companies making key executive hires and moves in July 2025.
This month, Ahead, Bulletproof and World Wide Technology are among the solution providers to list open positions while Armada, Vercel and Kaseya are among the vendors to list open positions for channel-related roles.
CRN has looked at open listings on LinkedIn that would bring talent into the channel either by working with a partner or by working at a vendor to support partners.
[RELATED: 20 Tech Companies Hiring In The IT Channel: June 2025]
Open Jobs In The IT ChannelOpen channel roles include:
The U.S. Added 147,000 jobs in June, exceeding most estimates, according to Bloomberg. Public education employment masked a slowdown in other sectors, with private payrolls rising by 74,000 in June, the least since October and largely due to health care employers. The unemployment rate was 4.1 percent.
Here are some of the latest job openings in the channel.
Darktrace has an opening this month for a channel manager, according to a LinkedIn account.
The England-based security vendor wants this manager to "develop, implement, and manage targeted and measurable partnership strategies and campaigns to generate new business opportunities as well as upsell opportunities with channel partners, according to the listing.
Candidates should have a minimum of five years of experience, plus an "ability to build lasting relationships with stakeholders across all organizational levels through open, honest, two-way and frequent communication."
Darktrace has more than 500 partners worldwide, according to the company.
Its top channel goals for 2025 include increasing the overall percentage of company revenue that comes through the channel, according to CRN's 2025 Channel Chiefs.
Job seekers interested in a role as a channel account manager making at least $86,000 a year might consider this opening at Mimecast.
The England-based email security company wants this CAM to "develop and execute Go-To-Market business plans with key focus partners" and "accurately forecast partner opportunities in coordination with direct sales teams," according to the LinkedIn post.
Candidates should have "experience selling cloud solutions, particularly Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)" plus "thrive in a fast-paced, dynamic environment and adapt to changing priorities."
Mimecast also has a listing for a senior channel solutions engineer who can make at least $100,000 a year.
The engineer will "lead technical strategy, drive scalable partner enablement programs, and foster a thriving technical community across our partner ecosystem," according to the listing.
Candidates should have "experience in sales engineering or technical support, preferably in cybersecurity or SaaS" and "deep knowledge of cybersecurity, email technologies, Microsoft 365, and complementary solutions like CrowdStrike, Netskope, and OKTA."
Mimecast has about 4,000 channel partners worldwide, according to CRN's 2025 Channel Chiefs.
Exabeam has an open role this month for a senior director of global channel marketing who can make at least $200,000 a year, according to a LinkedIn post.
The Foster City, Calif.-based security company wants this director "to lead the design and execution of our next-generation partner marketing engine" and "architect a global partner marketing strategy aligned to Exabeam's channel vision and GTM goals," according to the post.
Candidates should have "10+ years in global partner or channel marketing, with a strong background in enterprise SaaS or cybersecurity" plus at least a bachelor's degree.
Exabeam has about 1,000 channel partners worldwide, according to CRN's 2025 Channel Chiefs.
Kaseya has dozens of job listings this month that may appeal to people looking for new work in the channel.
The Miami-based MSP tools provider's openings include:
Kaseya has about 50,000 channel partners worldwide, according to CRN's 2025 Channel Chiefs.
An opening for a system integrator partner development manager in the Americas who can make at least $199,000 a year is available this month at LaunchDarkly.
The Oakland, Calif.-based developer operations (DevOps) tools vendor wants this manager to "serve as a subject matter expert in SI and GSI partnerships, applying deep domain knowledge and leadership to drive partner engagement, enablement, and joint go-to-market initiatives," according to the LinkedIn post.
The manager will "lead the development and execution of global partnership strategies with top-tier GSIs (e.G., Accenture, Deloitte, Cognizant, etc.), ensuring alignment with LaunchDarkly's business objectives and customer success goals."
Candidates should have "8+ years of experience in partnerships, alliances, or business development, with a focus on enterprise software and systems integrator partnerships," according to the post.
This month, ConnectWise seeks a senior software consulting specialistwho will be "responsible for interacting directly with partners for consulting and implementation needs."
The Tampa, Fla.-based MSP tools provider wants this specialist to work "in partnership with cross-functional teams to ensure clients have the necessary support needed as they become more integrated with ConnectWise products," according to the LinkedIn listing.
Candidates should have a "bachelor's degree in related field or equivalent business experience" and "4+ years of relevant experience."
ConnectWise has about 45,000 channel partners worldwide, according to CRN's 2025 Channel Chiefs.
Laserfiche has an offer this month for a partner marketing manager who can make at least $100,000 a year.
The Long Beach, Calif.-based digital transformation platform provider wants this manager to play "a pivotal role in developing, promoting, and expanding Laserfiche's Channel Partner, Strategic Partner, and Technology Partner programs," according to the LinkedIn listing. "This role will manage all marketing aspects of the partner programs, including recruitment, enablement, co-marketing, and communications."
Candidates should have "7+ years in channel and partner development with 5+ years of experience in B2B marketing."
Laserfiche's top channel goals for 2025 include increasing partners' customer satisfaction ratings, improving partner technical skills and increasing the amount of recurring revenue going through partners, according to CRN's 2025 Channel Chiefs.
An opening for a senior partner manager who can make at least $213,000 a year is available this month at Vercel.
The San Francisco-based front-end development platform vendor wants this manager to "lead Vercel's global alliance with key strategic partners and their broader channel ecosystems," according to a LinkedIn listing. The hire will "craft joint go-to-market motions that leverage market trends, product synergies, and whitespace opportunities within partner ecosystems to drive revenue growth."
Candidates should have "6+ years of experience in Sales, Partnerships, or Business Development, preferably in the SaaS or developer tooling space."
Vercel has more than 70 solution partners worldwide, according to the company.
This month on LinkedIn, Armada has an opening for a Microsoft alliance manager who can make at least $172,000 a year.
The San Francisco-based edge computing startup wants this manager to "serve as the central liaison between Armada's sales organization and Microsoft's partner and field teams, working to align joint selling efforts, managing deal registrations, and accelerating pipeline generation and deal closure for all deals where Armada partners with Microsoft," according to the LinkedIn post.
Candidates should have "5+ years of experience in partner/channel management, business development, or enterprise sales, preferably in the tech industry" and "proven success in managing co-sell motions and influencing partner-led revenue."
UiPath has an opening this month for an enterprise account executive who sells to global systems integrators.
The New York-based agentic automation vendor wants this AE to "sell to large (GSIs) for their internal business consumption" and "develop trusted relationships with local partners and global systems integrators to cultivate new opportunities and drive successful customer implementations," according to the LinkedIn listing.
Candidates should have "7+ years solution/value selling experience" and "3+ years Enterprise Accounts experience," according to the listing.
UiPath's top channel goals for 2025 include increasing the amount of professional services going through partners, according to CRN's 2025 Channel Chiefs.
LinkedIn this month shows a handful of job openings at Net at Work.
The New York-based company–No. 246 on CRN's 2025 Solution Provider 500––has listings on LinkedIn for roles that include:
Ahead has a variety of job openings that should interest job seekers in the channel.
The Chicago-based company–No. 27 on CRN's 2025 Solution Provider 500–seeks the following among its open positions:
Computacenter looks to boost its employee base this month with a wide variety of channel roles, according to dozens of LinkedIn job listings.
Job seekers interested in working for the England-based company–No. 19 on CRN's 2025 Solution Provider 500–might want to look at the following unfilled positions:
Synergy IT Solutions seeks a level one service desk analyst who can provide "effective diagnostic evaluation of end-user customer needs," according to a LinkedIn post.
The Cheektowaga, N.Y.-based company–a member of CRN's 2025 MSP 500–wants the analyst to be "identifying, researching, and resolving technical problems, timely responses to telephone calls and email requests for technical support," according to the listing.
Candidates should have "1-2 years of experience in a Help Desk environment" and "knowledge of Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Azure Admin portal."
ePlus is growing its team in a variety of ways this month, according to LinkedIn posts.
The Herndon, Va.-based company–a member of CRN's 2025 MSP 500–is recruiting for roles that include:
Valorem Reply has room for multiple new workers, according to LinkedIn job postings this month.
The Kansas City, Mo.-based company–No. 372 on CRN's 2025 Solution Provider 500–seeks the following among its open roles:
Medicus IT has several openings this month for channel job seekers, according to LinkedIn posts.
Among the available positions this month at the Alpharetta, Ga.-based company–No. 371 on CRN's 2025 Solution Provider 500–are:
World Wide Technology has dozens of unfilled positions available for channel job seekers this month.
The Maryland Heights, Mo.-based company–a member of CRN's 2025 MSP 500––lists the following among its open roles on LinkedIn:
Bulletproof, a GLI company, has multiple openings this month, according to LinkedIn listings.
The Fredericton, New Brunswick-based company–a member of CRN's 2025 MSP 500–seeks the following among its unfilled positions:
Cyber Advisors has an opening this month for a purchasing agent.
The Maple Grove, Minn.-based company–a member of CRN's 2025 MSP 500–wants this agent to be "responsible for sourcing and procuring materials, equipment, and services essential to the company's operations," according to a LinkedIn listing.
Candidates should have an "associate's or Bachelor's degree or relevant business experience" plus "proficiency in Microsoft Office and familiarity with ERP systems."
The Seventh Wave: How AI Will Change The Technology Industry
The Seventh Wave: How AI Will Change The Technology Industry
ForresterMy professional career has spanned six major tech changes: minicomputer, PC, internet, social, mobile, and cloud. Each of these revolutions brought a wave of new providers and destroyed swaths of legacy companies. Now comes the Seventh Wave of major tech change, driven by AI in its modern forms — generative and agentic.
In the '80s and '90s, when faced with a new wave, the legacy tech companies would freeze in the headlights or double down on their suddenly obsolete business models. This allowed new players to gain traction and redefine industries. So the mainframe players largely crumbled in the face of minicomputers, and the minicomputer industry was decimated by the PC. Executives back then were not learning-mindset thinkers, and they defaulted to stonewalling and then responding, but too late. Yes, Wang Laboratories and Digital Equipment did build PCs, but the new market had already been formed. Schumpeterian creative destruction held court.
Then came Clay Christensen and "The Innovator's Dilemma" — a book that succinctly stated how legacy companies get stuck in their old expensive business model and are bypassed by cheap newcomers. The incumbents protect the fort until the fort is worthless (cliche cf. Kodak).
The new tech guard read Christensen's book. Starting around the turn of the millennium, they began to deploy four legacy defensive strategies when faced with a paradigm change: 1) Buy the interlopers (cf. Instagram, WhatsApp); 2) Block the new wave with regulation, pricing, packaging, consortia, and partnerships (cf. Partnership on AI); 3) Pretend that you are part of the new era (cf. Agentforce); and 4) Link existing dominant products with new offerings to keep challengers at bay (cf. Embedding Copilot in Office). These strategies are not always successful, but they are far more effective than the old "Deny and die" stance of the previous generation of executives.
Will these strategies work for the legacy tech companies as the AI revolution intensifies? Here's my take on what lies ahead.
The Enterprise Software BusinessBefore AI ever showed up, this tech sector had three problems:
Against this sour backdrop comes AI, which offers three threats to the software industry:
Will buyers listen to these pitches? CEOs and business leaders certainly will — they are desperate for more agility. But development staffs and CIOs who have staked their careers and skill sets on legacy systems will resist. Business is ready to move on; technology teams will drag their feet.
So the enterprise software business won't change quickly, especially as the incumbents deploy their typical arsenal of weapons to defend their positions — Buy, Block, Pretend, and Link. But the promise of AI computing is going to make this old vs. New battle very hard fought.
The Impact On Other Tech SectorsWhile software will be most changed by AI, there will be impact across the breadth of the industry.
AI needs cycles, so the hardware segment will get a very big boost from this wave. Yes, there will be a transition away from CPUs to GPUs, and the NVIDIA stranglehold will take another 12 to 15 months to break, but systems from cloud to laptops will be vastly stimulated by this change. Expect this business to grow in the 8%-10% range per year over the next five years.
Technology services, which has been under massive pressure since 2023 due to over-expansion in the 2021–22 timeframe, will experience whiplash from AI. On one hand, the legacy software systems that PwC, Deloitte, and others have implemented for decades and that comprise much of their expertise, will be challenged in the short term and shrink in the long term. Simultaneously, there will be massive demand for expertise in AI. Cognizant, Capgemini, and others will be called on to help companies implement AI computing systems and migrate away from legacy vendors. Forrester believes that the tech services sector will grow by 3.6% in 2025 — I believe that rate could increase to 5% to 6% per year from 2026 to 2030 — driven by AI.
Forrester has telecommunication and communications equipment growing 1.5% and 0.8% globally in 2025. These growth rates could be doubled in the upcoming years by the movement of prompts and answers between users and AI data centers. Yes, there will be good distilled systems sitting on laptops and in edge computing, but at least 70% of AI computing will run off private and public clouds. The Seventh Wave will require and will stimulate communications and network investments and infrastructure.
The Cool KidsHow will AI impact the big five consumer tech companies?
Alphabet/Google. Indexed search is dying, and Google is struggling to reformulate its advertising business to operate in the Seventh Wave. Advertising is like Keith Richards and cockroaches — it will never go away — it evolves and persists. So yes, the surveillance business model will be recreated in the AI world and Google will pull out all stops to retain a portion of its hegemony in that space. Look for Alphabet to deploy the Buy and Link defensive strategies — vacuuming up promising AI advertising startups and offering discounting and packaging deals to extant search customers that want to experiment with the Google AI advertising platform. Three advantages that the company will attempt to leverage are its cloud position, extensive training data, and its deep expertise in generative (remember that Google invented the transformers that make this technology possible).
Meta/Facebook. The images and data that users dump into Facebook on a daily basis give Meta a big training advantage. And Meta AI, because it is embedded in Facebook (and other properties), has over 1 billion users — more than any other LLM. But the company's platform will be challenged by newcomers introducing AI social solutions that will steal users and reformulate the rules of social media — bringing higher trust, faster learning, escape from the Facebook algorithm, better summarizing of daily and weekly content, and better automated moderation. Expect Meta to use all four defensive strategies to defend its citadel — with an emphasis on linking its existing advertising offerings to prevent advertisers from migrating to new AI platforms. The "Move fast and break things" culture at Meta will engender a particularly chaotic and at times desperate posture as it subordinates customer interests in favor of gaining strategic high ground in the new era.
Amazon. As the Seventh Wave e-commerce world emerges, Amazon will use its hyperdominant retail and cloud position to attempt to aggressively box out challengers. AI commerce will bypass the Web in favor of direct-to-consumer apps and hyperpersonalization, but expect Amazon to attempt to obsolete itself and lead that revolution. Look for the company to deploy the Buy, Block, and Link strategies in the face of challengers and, most importantly, to use its dominance in cloud to finance innovative forays into new AI ground.
Microsoft. Coupling its strong positions in cloud and software, Microsoft will do well in the new world, with the threat of "Microsoft fatigue" the only real factor that could impede its Seventh Wave prospects. The company has already deployed its Buy and Block strategy, taking a large position in OpenAI (Buy) and engaging in partnerships (Block) to freeze out newcomers. Microsoft's leadership is as fanatical as Meta's in its determination to not fall into the Innovator's Dilemma. So watch for seemingly irrational behavior and erratic tactical moves, as leadership is unafraid to confuse customers and take outsized capital risks.
Apple. An AI phone? Apple is clearly the biggest AI laggard of the cool tech kids. Complex software is not the company's forte, so it is vulnerable, as has been evident in its AI fumbling (cf. Apple Photos). Tim Cook is going to have to use the company's massive cash hoard to buy its way into AI as its internal efforts fail to generate adequate innovation. I would watch this space for a very large deal to acquire one of the independent LLM companies such as Mistral or Anthropic.
ConclusionTech CEOs, from Satya Nadella to Marc Benioff to Sundar Pichai, are scrambling. Their products and services are about to be challenged by a new way to do work, and they are determined to not be swept away (or be made zombies) in the Seventh Wave.
It will be a good time for the incumbents to deploy the Buy, Block, Pretend, and Link strategies, as the current administration in Washington will likely loosen antitrust oversight. But given the first six months of this administration, there may be more unpredictability than expected on that front.
Another factor that could help the legacy players is the state of the private equity and venture markets. They are currently holding many illiquid assets (companies) from the pre-AI period — they will have to sell these depreciated assets before they can raise new capital to invest in the Seventh Wave challengers. Confusion in capital markets will work in favor of the incumbents, as will their very large cash reserves.
What are the best strategies for CIOs? 1) Beware legacy vendors bearing AI gifts — they are faking it until they can make it, pretending that their platforms can transition to the Seventh Wave; 2) Increase your artificial intelligence quotient (go here if you are a client, summary if not) so that you and your team can sort the reality from the fantasy that will be assaulting you from your legacy suppliers and from startups; 3) If you can afford to delay, you may want to put off big software changes until AI finance, AI CRM, and AI ERP offerings become available from AI-native vendors. That won't happen until late 2026 and 2027.
This post was written by Forrester CEO George Colony and it originally appeared here.
The Real Cost Of Silicon Valley's Rush To Market: Why AI Safety Can't Be An Afterthought
JoAnn Yamani is a Senior Fellow of Future 500.
gettyThe recent report revealing how major tech companies prioritize AI product development over safety research should serve as a wake-up call for an industry that has historically prided itself on responsible innovation. As someone who has guided technology companies through critical transformations for over two decades, I've witnessed firsthand how the pressure to maintain competitive advantage can lead organizations to make shortcuts that ultimately undermine their long-term success and societal impact.
The statistics are sobering: AI models are becoming "more likely to be good at bad stuff," according to cybersecurity experts, while companies slash safety testing times from months to days. Major tech companies have deprioritized fundamental research units in favor of product development, executives have urged teams to stop building overly cautious products, and leading AI companies have admitted to making "the wrong call" by releasing models despite expert concerns. This isn't just a technical problem—it's a communications and leadership crisis that threatens to erode the trust technology companies have built for decades.
Having navigated communications strategies during product recalls at a major electric vehicle company, leadership transitions at multiple organizations and complex merger integrations at technology hardware companies, I understand executives' intense pressure to deliver results quickly. However, the current AI rush represents a fundamental misunderstanding of how sustainable competitive advantage is built in technology markets.
The False Economy Of SpeedThe notion that companies must choose between thorough safety testing and market competitiveness represents a false dichotomy that reveals short-term thinking. During my time helping transform a technology company from a patent enforcement entity to a respected technology innovator, we learned that authentic market positioning requires substance, not just speed. The partnerships with major retailers and cloud providers that followed weren't the result of rushing products to market—they emerged from building genuine technological credibility through rigorous development processes.
Similarly, when I guided an electric vehicle company through multiple crises, including product recalls and missed earnings calls, the companies that maintained stakeholder confidence weren't those that moved fastest, but those that demonstrated consistent commitment to user safety and transparent communication about their processes. The brands that survive and thrive during turbulent periods prioritize trust over temporary market advantages.
The Communication ImperativeWhat's particularly troubling about the current AI landscape is how companies handle communication around these safety trade-offs. Major AI companies have released models without proper documentation—essentially launching products without telling users or the industry about their limitations and potential dangers. This isn't just poor product management; it's a communication failure that signals to stakeholders that the company either doesn't understand the risks or doesn't respect users enough to be transparent about them.
Effective crisis communication, which I've practiced across industries from automotive to semiconductors, requires avoiding problems rather than reacting to them. Companies cutting corners on AI safety testing are creating the conditions for future crises that will be far more damaging to their reputations and market positions than any temporary competitive disadvantage they're trying to avoid.
Learning From Adjacent IndustriesThe technology industry can learn valuable lessons from other sectors that have grappled with the tension between innovation speed and safety protocols. In my work with automotive companies, I've seen how rigorous safety testing accelerates long-term market acceptance by building consumer confidence. The automotive industry's systematic approach to safety validation hasn't slowed innovation—it's enabled the rapid adoption of technologies like electric vehicles and autonomous driving features because consumers trust the development processes.
The pharmaceutical industry offers another instructive parallel. While drug companies face intense pressure to bring treatments to market quickly, those that maintain rigorous clinical trial standards ultimately achieve better market outcomes because regulatory approval and physician adoption depend on demonstrated safety profiles.
The Path ForwardTechnology companies need to reframe AI safety not as a barrier to innovation but as a competitive differentiator. Organizations that develop robust safety evaluation processes and communicate transparently about their approaches will ultimately command greater market trust and regulatory confidence. This requires several key shifts:
First, companies must invest in communications strategies that help stakeholders understand why comprehensive safety testing serves everyone's interests. The current narrative that positions safety measures as obstacles to progress fundamentally misrepres

Comments
Post a Comment